Open the flank, send seven on the diagonal — inside Reinerio Márquez's game model
FAL Playbook · Modelos
Eleven minutes. That’s the length of a video in which a South-American coach sits alone in front of a camera and lays out his game model. No interviewer, no question sheet, no whiteboard. He simply takes the picture of football in his head and pulls it out, piece by piece. And within those eleven minutes, five words keep surfacing — quick action, short pass, combination, diagonal, position change. Those five words hold up his entire model.
That is where Modelos begins: mapping the model a coach states in his own words onto a four-phase framework, and recording — in the same pass — both the precision and the gaps that mapping reveals. In this case, the precision lives in attack, and the gap lives in transition.
A build-up that starts wide and ends wide
His attack starts at the goalkeeper’s feet — but it does not climb straight through the middle. “It’s important to play to open side with the full back or the wingers.” He opens the flank first. The ball is switched side to side, cracking the opponent’s pressing shape, and the moment a crack appears a through ball goes in — or, failing that, a full-back simply drives the ball forward himself.
Just before the finish, five or six players are inside the box. The phrase he leans on is almost the same word repeated — quick action, very quickly action, little pass. Fast, fast, with short passes. And the decisive finish runs through a third man: released by a one-two, then through two players, a third strikes. This is not improvisation — it is a formula.
“Seven attacking, three supporting” — the model’s division of labour
This is just about the only quantitative statement he offers in the whole video. “Maybe seven players in attacker and three players in support.” Seven committed to attack, three holding behind. Seven out of eleven is a number that never appears in a conservative system. Take it as a one-line declaration of the football he wants to play.
And how do those seven move? “Play with diagonal in any pay to try to the half space.” Diagonally, everywhere, toward the half-space. Every line attacks not on the same heading but at different angles. Full-backs pinch inside, midfielders refuse the straight line, wingers join high. The result is several lines crossing the box simultaneously from different angles. That is how what he calls change position actually works.
And all of it happens inside roughly 25 metres. “It’s blocking short. We use a space very, very short, maybe 25 meters.” A compact 25-metre attacking block makes both the frequency of short passes and the speed of combination possible at once — and, in theory, makes immediate recovery after losing the ball easier too.
Defense compresses to two axes
The man who unspooled six principles in attack compresses defense into two: position marking zone and high pressure man to man. A hybrid of line and zone marking, plus a hard one-on-one press on whoever has the ball. The lines — two or three of them — stay close to one another and close to the opponent.
When three forwards press up top, the defensive midfielder takes responsibility for the link to the back line in case that press is beaten — “to the balance and cover the ball” — and through all of it runs the rule that the players must talk to one another constantly: all hold every time, talking the player.
The honest read of this defensive account: it is not detailed. Line height, the trigger for the press (first touch? back-pass? square ball?), the recovery line when the press fails — the standard precision items go unstated. That doesn’t mean his coaching is thin; it means he is a coach who thinks of his model in the language of attack.
The biggest gap — the instant after losing the ball
Hold his account up to the four-phase frame and one cell shows up nearly empty: the attack-to-defense transition. How he reacts the instant possession is lost — straight into a counter-press, or drop and reset the lines — there is no explicit statement of it in the eleven minutes.
One can infer that the 25-metre compact block indirectly enables a counter-press, but that is the analyst’s inference, not the coach’s declaration. In a serious game-model assessment, that difference is decisive.
“The first five seconds after losing the ball — what is your principle?”
Is this a flaw in the model, or a matter of stated priority? Modelos does not rule. It records that this gap is the part of his model most in need of filling, and leaves a single question to put to him in a follow-up interview — the one above.
No school — defining himself as a “South-American coach”
One more thing of interest. He ties himself to no school. posicional, Tactical Periodization, Relationism — none leave his mouth. In their place, a single line: “We are South American coaches. It’s very strong.” Where he stakes his identity is not a school but a region.
Read it two ways. One is freedom — the freedom to build his own combination unbound by any school. The other is indeterminacy — the possibility that he has not yet fixed the theoretical position of his own model. Modelos leaves both open. In comparison with the rounds to come, his place will sharpen.
The one thing that sets him apart
Plenty of coaches talk about combination. Plenty talk about the half-space. But coaches who emphasise all four of these at once are uncommon — diagonal movement, half-space penetration, seven-man commitment, fast combination. The picture of those four operating together inside a 25-metre block.
That picture is his signature. Modelo 01 · Reinerio Márquez has only traced its outline. Filling it in — verification against match footage, reconstruction of the training micro-cycle, reinforcement through a follow-up interview — is the next step.
Full four-phase breakdown (sources & sub-principles)
Phase 1 · Organized Attack
① Build-up: open-side switch
Source“When they start with the goalkeeper, it’s important to play to open side with the full back or the wingers… switch the ball, the position the ball move… to the any space to the opponent.”
- Open-side build-up
- Side-to-side switching
- Positioning to crack the opponent’s space
② Progression: driving · through ball · cross
Source“…the driving with the ball — the right full back, the left back — and after cross the ball, and we attack it with this five or six players.”
- Full-back ball-carrying (driving)
- Line-splitting through balls
- Crossed finish with 5–6 in the box
③ Finishing: many-man fast combination
Source“Quick action, very quickly action, little pass… combination to open the space.” / “When you play to one or two touches, used to the third man should score.”
- 5–7 in the box
- One-/two-touch combination
- Third-man finishing pattern
- CB / CF box arrivals
④ Space occupation: half-space + diagonal
Source“Play with diagonal in any pay to try to the half space… seven players in attacker and three players in support.”
- Diagonal movement
- Half-space penetration
- Simultaneous multi-line runs
⑤ Position change (free movement)
Source“Free action, free move and connection with the ball… not always move in a straight, it’s important to move in any position.”
- Full-backs moving inside
- Non-linear midfield runs
- Wingers joining high
- Full-back / winger overlaps
⑥ Block compactness (25m)
Source“It’s blocking short. We use a space very, very short, maybe 25 meters.”
- ~25m attacking block
- 7 attack / 3–4 support division
Phase 2 · Negative Transition (Attack → Defense)
▽ No stated principle
No explicit principle for the attack-to-defense transition appears anywhere in the video. The 25m compact block may mediate it indirectly, but there is no trigger statement distinguishing immediate counter-press from retreat-and-reset.
Phase 3 · Organized Defense
① Position–zone marking (hybrid)
Source“All things come back to the position marking zone… we close the any space.”
- Line-based positioning
- Closing space over the zone
② Line compactness
Source“In a very small space, the two lines or three lines… have them together, close to the space with the opponent.”
- Minimal inter-line distance
- Closing distance to the opponent
- Left–right balance
③ Man-to-man high press
Source“When they recover an attacker, we are pressure, high pressure to man to man.”
- Man-to-man on the ball-carrier
- Closing space while pressing
④ DM balance & cover
Source“…defensive midfielder — to the balance and cover the ball when the three attacker… man to man.”
- DM as the defense–midfield link
- Ball-cover responsibility
⑤ Constant communication
Source“All hold every time… talking the player… important for the connection.”
Phase 4 · Positive Transition (Defense → Attack)
① Recovery on the far side
Source“It’s important to recover the ball — and the other side, the side to the opponent.”
② Immediate wide switch
Straight after recovery, build-up opens via the full-back or winger. In his account, the positive transition is less a separate phase than something merged with the first stage of attack.
Set Pieces & Methodology
Source“Fixed tactical… corner kick… free kick… throw-in. We use video analysis… statistics about the opponent… We are South American coaches.”
- Distinct strategies for corners / free kicks / throw-ins; single penalty taker
- Active video analysis; growing use of opponent & own-team statistics
- Studies all positions himself; stakes identity on “South-American coach”
Analyst Read — Modelos
- Attack detailed vs defense simple. Six clear principles in attack against two axes in defense — plainly an attack-oriented coach.
- Negative transition absent. The biggest gap in the assessment frame; a core area for Modelos to reinforce.
- Sparse numbers. “25m” and “7+3” are nearly the only figures; line height, press distance, PPDA all unstated.
- No school stated. No positional / periodization / relationist allegiance; regional identity stands in its place.
- Strongest signature. Diagonal + half-space + many-man + fast combination operating together inside 25m.
Football Agent Lab — Vistru Partners
